Article VII – Putting
This Constitution into Practice – How We Can Begin Now Where We Are
As for now, each city and town’s residents may begin to put this process
into practice through direct action in anticipation of these methods becoming
the legitimate authority of the city and the city becoming the legitimate
authority politically.
1) All neighborhoods
or small towns of all kinds everywhere in the world could begin immediately to
set aside a time each month, say two weekend afternoons or weekday evenings, to
hold assemblies, make decisions for themselves and set up a budget. This would
immediately stand in a situation of “dual power” with regard to the established
city council government. The idea is not conflict but to establish the greater
moral authority, and democratic legitimacy of the assemblies.
2) Citizens could then
declare a day, after several months or a few years of such practice, once
established and once its authority had won over a critical mass of participants
in the city, when they would refuse to go to work during that time because they
intended to attend assemblies. They would demand that the existing authority
authorize this new 4-day workweek (as noted above) but would not need to wait
for that, for if an entire city refused to work on say Wednesday any longer it
would become fact and other cities would follow.
3) Organizing through
some association both a nonviolence self-defense training, which would serve
for the struggle to establish the new system in the city, and a militia with
training, now essentially legal in most parts of the United States and in some
parts of the world. If the bearing of arms by citizens is not legal, the
militia could exist anyway and train with innocuous instruments but show its
organization, self-government, discipline and collective dignity. Under no
circumstances should armed conflict with the existing police, or armed forces
be undertaken.
4) Print and
distribute their own money city-wide. Ithaca, New York deserves credit to have
been the first to have attempted this approach to create community. Again, this
can start as a nonprofit association and a “barter” system, but using money for
what is really is: merely a points system to keep track of who owes what to
whom for services rendered. Businesses, farmers’ markets, cooperatives and
individuals can sign up and begin providing each other services using this
currency. In some countries any income earned needs to be declared as income.
Though if seen as merely a way to facilitate activity it could also be the
practice to eliminate all such income at the end of the year and restart the
distribution again the following year.
5) Set up cooperatives
for buying, producing or any other activity to practice self-government.
6) Demand or set up
where available land is to be had, community gardens and other methods to
establish greater food self-sufficiency, and health and food sovereignty.
7) Establish
well-organized food distribution systems through “Community-supported
agriculture” (though I take Wendell Berry’s criticism of this particular title
for these as reasonable) by making contact with local and nearby farmers to
provide them a guaranteed market for their produce. Then, to create a critical
mass of demand for locally produced and organic food to convince by protest,
electoral power, or other means the local institutions such as hospitals,
schools, universities, company cafeterias etc. to buy this locally produced
food.
8) To set up
cooperative “supermarkets” and buying groups to purchase in bulk that food and
other products that near expiration date to be made available for local
currency at a low price or free to the city’s citizens and those in need.
9) To set up, by
pressuring even the existing city government, a local bank or credit union to
serve as a place for all the city’s residents to set up an account.
10) Setting up
cooperatives to provide other services, such as laundry services for the large
institutions like hospitals, schools etc. in the city to start up a solid cooperative
sector of the local economy.
11) Establishing a
cooperative for local energy needs, and a public generator and utility,
eventually freeing the city from dependence on oil companies, coal companies,
utility companies and the like.
12) An alternative
“Conflict Resolution” system where juries of city residents can utilize the
option of temporary banishment from the city for those accused of
medium-serious crimes as determined appropriate. Establishment of a Rehabilitation Collective for those who
voluntarily turn themselves in and negotiation with the existing police, public
prosecutor and public defenders offices (under public pressure by the movement
of course) to accept this conflict resolution process as an easier way to
obtain confessions, “convictions” and self-sentencing by those found guilty
rather than the expense and violence of prisons (granted this one is the
hardest to obtain under present conditions, but even establishing the
alternative in the public mind is worth the effort).
13) Some initiative of
engagement with the local police, such that the worldwide trend toward
militarization of police is reversed or at least limited. For example to
convince the police to no longer accept nationally-provided armaments and
hardware. Again, a tough sell. But it takes the initiative.
14) Later to establish
the assemblies as a legitimate form of authority recognized by law as the
city’s ultimate governing bodies – this may in many places require changing
regional, state or national law however.
15) A direct action
initiative at a LATE stage (to put this first as I can imagine many of my
anarchist friends wishing to do) to organize a city-wide withdrawal of taxes
paid to national and state/regional governments IN COOPERATION with other
cities doing the same (to have on city only do so would be suicide for the
movement itself).
16) The preceding
proposal for direct action tax withdrawal is only practicable for a network of
cities that had first established significant levels of self-sufficiency in
basic needs and also had well-established local currencies circulating AND
which still had considerable access to products of the national or world market
since until the establishment of a non-political agency to (acting more or less
as the US Social Security Office does) supply the global currency for
inter-city exchange such cities would be vulnerable to great economic hardship
and the whole project could then easily lose support. Alternatively, a large
network of like-minded cities could establish an alternative basis for exchange
using a single currency between them (none has to change hands, just numbers in
bank accounts in the publicly owned credit union/banks).
17) Knowing the
possibilities of massive state repression at some point in this process the
coordination of nonviolence self-defense groups citywide AND the local
production of arms for self-governing militia should begin, not to provoke a
conflict but merely to make clear to national states that military repression
is not an option or at least would be a costly one.
18) Declaration of
assumption of governing authority by cities, regions, and their coordination
among themselves to begin to create the infrastructure for a planetary
civilization based on universal access to citizenship for all, to provision of
basic and comfortable subsistence for the needs of all, renewable energy, and
self-government.
19) The neutrality of
the coordinating agencies, based as they are on the retaking into the hands of
citizens worldwide and their cities and townships as public spheres of
participation and self-government are an end to the “state” as such though not
to politics or political activity or government. These coordinating bodies have
no authority, an act merely as oversight bodies to be sure that no is being
exploited or oppressed at which point they must mobilize, on the basis only of
being delegated coordinating bodies, the member cities to act together against
a common problem or threat, or they act to coordinate the efforts for those
projects, such as environmental repair, climate change reversal (mostly
effected by these locally-organized changes but still needing some larger scale
coordination), stopping any aggression by any given city or group, and for
coordinating any infrastructure such as continental roadways, air travel (using
renewable energy obviously) satellites, space exploration (we may be close to
folding space to allow for “faster than light” space “travel” (by not moving at
all of course according to Einstein’s General Relativity), and the like.
Thus these act more as juridical or mediating bodies
and as delegated agencies to carry out tasks decided on by the citizens in
their respective cities and townships, not as political institutions. This is
in complete contrast to the existing United Nations, IMF, World Bank, WTO, G20,
NATO and the rest. These global governance organizations will be abolished both
by being disbanded by the movement of the self-governing cities and by the
withdrawal of taxes to national states at the end of the process.
In many cases however, the penalty process involving
enslavement or war crimes will apply to some of the heads of these
organizations during their rule.
20) Thus, it would be
possible to maintain an urban and global civilization in which everyone had a
citizenship status, in which movement to where one wanted to live was much
freer than today (the 1% minimum is roughly double the number of immigrants
arriving annually to the US), in which the wage system and capitalism were
abolished, in which money became a mere utility until it too no longer served,
in which national borders and national armies were done away with, in which the
global ecology could be restored and maintained, in which learning and
teaching, healing, growing food, making useful and beautiful things, connecting
human communities by transport and communications, could all be done for their
own sake, rather than for profit. Where defending one’s community and keeping
it safe, rehabilitating or where needed punishing of those who act violently or
exploit without prisons or the death penalty, where in all probability ending
war, and where community but
universality at the same time in something that would be worthy of the name
civilization would be possible without imperialism or conquest.
And we could start wherever we are, now, and indeed as
these proposals indicate, many aspects of these have already begun, so we begin
from something that already exists.
* The proposals here have come out of years of conversations with
activists, comrades, friends and scholars, from studies of past societies,
contemporary technologies, practical experience with cooperatives,
community-supported agriculture, alternative political parties, green politics,
socialist and communist politics, local initiatives to remake cities, studies
of movements around the world and the like. I don’t take credit for them, they
have been the result of the efforts of many people. Only the things that won’t
work or are inadequate are my own.
The idea is to develop a political sphere that allows us to go from the
experiences of direct democracy embodied in the many movements of 2011
(Indignados, Greek revolts, Occupy, the Arab Spring etc.) to the holding of a
political sphere and self-governing it in a way that takes us past and out of
capitalism. The city is big enough to allow for an “articulation” or ensemble
of many “commons” activities including cooperatives and yet small enough to
allow for citizen participation. It also allows for a vast diversity of ethnic and other
backgrounds, and so allows for a localism that is not ethnically or
conservatively based on specific customs. It defuses to some degree issues of
immigration over national borders, since
there are many cities one can go to. It allows for public ownership but citizen
control and workers control, and avoids mass bureaucracy and state power, yet
keeps politics. Indeed, it allows us to imagine everyone in the world having a
citizenship status – here I had in mind the Medieval cities that allowed one to
be a citizen if having escaped from serfdom for a year and a day. So, cosmopolitanism but local
community as well.
So I do not name the following people and groups or cities because they
would agree, approve or like this nor because they take any responsibility for
any of my bad ideas, but merely to avoid plagiarism – I have learned so much
from so many. Here is where I got most of this stuff from:
The Zapatista Autonomous Good Government Towns
Midnight Notes
A lot of friends, including but not limited to those thinking and
practicing communing, among whom: Peter
Linebaugh, Silvia Federici, George Caffentzis
Jonathan Feldman
Dan Karan
Dario Padovan
Linda Schade
Max Tomba
Cleveland, Ohio and it cooperatives movement
Gar Alperovitz
Porto, Alegre, Brazil’s Participatory Budgeting
The Shakers Villages
The Amana Communities in Iowa
Staughton Lynd
Murray Bookchin
Ithaca, New York
Burlington, Vermont
Massimo De Angelis
Padova2020
Wendell Berry
And so many others whom I thank even if they don’t like this idea.
Nessun commento:
Posta un commento